PATCH 2010
Submissions | ePaper | Subscribe | Panther Project | Twitter | Facebook | En Espanol | BizLink | Contact Us
Northeast Nebraska's Most Reliable News Source
Norfolk Daily News | Norfolk, NE
Ag

home : news : news home September 02, 2010

9/9/2009 9:20:00 AM
Council lets voters decide on fluoride
By JERRY GUENTHER
Regional editor

Norfolkans will get to vote next May whether they want fluoride to be added to the city’s water supply.

At Tuesday’s Norfolk City Council meeting, the council voted 6-2 to have the issue placed on the primary election ballot.

That action came after the council was deadlocked 4-4 on a motion that would have had fluoride added to the water supply automatically as allowed by state statute.

That option would have meant those against fluoridation would have needed to gather about 2,100 signatures to have the issue placed on the ballot by initiative petition. The 2,100 signatures represent about 15 percent of the registered voters in Norfolk.



Council member Dale Coy said the issue isn’t about fluoridation so much as it is about whether voters are given a chance to decide.

“The state legislature didn’t mandate that we put fluoridation (in),” Coy said. “They mandated that we decide how the choice is made.”

Mayor Sue Fuchtman, who was called upon to cast the tie-breaking vote, said she agrees with Coy and others who believe that residents should be given a chance to vote on the issue, especially without having to go through the expense of a special election.

On two previous occasions, most recently in 1998, Norfolkans have voted against fluoridation.

At Tuesday’s meeting, council members chose among three alternatives. The first was to hold an election on the issue during the May primary. The second was to hold a special election.

Some council members said they did not see the need to have a special election because of the additional expense, which could be up to $20,000.

The final alternative was to add fluoride to the city water supply as mandated by state law. That alternative, which the council tied on 4-4, would have meant opponents would have needed to gather signatures to have the issue placed on the ballot.

Council member Ivan Van Dyke said he supports fluoridation and led vocal support for it.

During discussion, a letter was read in support from Kathy Nordby, health director for the Elkhorn Logan Valley Public Health Department of Wisner.

In the letter, Nordby said there is some misinformation spread about fluoridation that can make people skeptical and fearful, leading them to take the view of “I’d rather err on the side of caution.”

“In this case, one may think that bringing the issue to a vote is doing a service to the people, when, in fact, a disservice would be done as anti-flouridationists would have the opportunity to resort to their usual method of scare tactics,” Nordby wrote.

Council member Jim Lange said he supported the third alternative because it keeps a “vocal minority” from dictating that there be a special election.

Lange and Van Dyke cast the dissenting votes of having the issue placed on the primary ballot.

Earlier, council members Lange, Van Dyke, Vicki Saunders and Jim Brenneman voted in support of having fluoride added. Coy, Karl Reeder, Dave Fauss and Erik Wilson voted against that option, which then required the mayor to cast the tie-breaker. 





Reader Comments

Posted: Sunday, September 13, 2009
Article comment by: randy armstrong

if the state is mandating this, they really need something better to do with their time than this. the state doesn't want to play fair so they use these tactics of arm twisting by requiring a vote of the people in order to prevent what they already said they didn't want. i guess government just knows best, huh?

Posted: Thursday, September 10, 2009
Article comment by: Jerry Guenther

In all fairness to the Norfolk City Council, it didn't bring the issue up this time. The Nebraska Legislature has passed a law that mandates that all cities must fluoridate their water unless voters decide to opt out before June 1 of next year. If no vote is held, the city would have been required to add fluoride.

Posted: Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Article comment by: Lynn Ferguson

This issue has been turned down twice. So what part of NO isn't understood. I question the reasoning for continuing to bring the issue up time and time again when the voters have already spoken loud and clear.



Article Comment Submission Form
Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the Editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required.  Your telephone number and E-mail address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Phone:
Required
Email:
Required
Message:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search




Reader Poll
What single factor is the best way to improve students’ performances on standardized tests?




Please select one:
Trying new programs and methods that work in other states
Going back to methods that worked before
Getting parents more involved
Hiring more teachers to improve student-teacher ratios
Requiring all teachers to be available to help before and after school
Increase homework assignments
Something not listed

View Results

SubmissionsSubscribeePaperContact UsFootball ContestSports HubLife


Norfolk Business Directory

More Norfolk businesses




NDN Logo
© 2010 Norfolk Daily News. All rights reserved
Norfolk Daily News • 525 Norfolk Avenue/ P.O. Box 977 • Norfolk, Nebraska 68701
(402) 371-1020 or toll free (877) 371-1020 Fax: (402) 371-5802
Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Webmaster@norfolkdailynews.com
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
© Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Click here for more information.


Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved